A: Remoteness of Damage
B: Absolute Privilege
C: Legalised by prescription
D: Contributory Negligence
举一反三
- 中国大学MOOC: Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?
- The third pedestrian knocked at the window ______. A: to tell the driver what time it was B: to ask the time C: to see what the driver was doing
- For what did the policewoman stop the car A: The car was too old. B: The car driver was heavily drank. C: The policeman needed a car. D: The car driver broke the speed limit.
- Which of the following statements is INCORRECT According to Simpson, he stopped at the pedestrian crossing because ______. A: the passenger in the front seat didn’t wear seatbelt B: there were two elderly people on the road C: the other driver was speeding up D: a police officer stopped him
- . The driver was caught ______ the speed limit on the road and got a speeding ticket.
内容
- 0
Which of the two sentences sounds more natural?[input=type:blank,size:4][/input] A. If you play football on the road, a car may hit you.B. If you play football on the road, you may be hit by a car.
- 1
The accident was caused by（） A: the driver of the first car B: the driver of the second car C: the driver of the third car D: both B and C
- 2
According to the passage, at a pedestrian crossing you should not （） A: expect cars to stop for you B: cross without giving the driver enough time to stop C: step off the pavement D: expect drivers to give you enough time to cross
- 3
Questions 11-13 are based on the following conversation between a driver and a police officer. What did the police officer threaten to do?（） A: Give the driver a ticket. B: Take the driver to court. C: Retain the driver's car. D: Take the driver to the police station.
- 4
The patrolman signaled to the speeding driver to pull___